PT on the Net Research

Training with Bands and Pulleys - Part 1: Beyond Free-Weight

Over the last decade, the buzz phrase has become “Functional Training.” The use of many modalities has been proposed to increase the functional aspect of training. These modalities include medicine balls, stability balls, rubber tubing and various pulley systems. Of all of the modalities being used to enhance the specificity of training, one of the most debated is band and pulley training (BPT). This article series on BPT will cover the basic concept behind the use of non-vertical resistance training. We have termed it “non-vertical vector (N2V) training.” We will follow this first part with some sample exercises and recommendations for workouts that have been successfully used in our facility.

When looking at the characteristics of band and pulley training, most conditioning professionals quickly observe the key advantage provided by BPT is the ability to load non-vertical vectors. Although all resistance training involves force vectors, we coined the phrase “N2V training” when referring to BPT because of the ability to load any vector quickly and easily. This is especially true when it comes to loading the net resultant vector associated with a specific movement.

When the body moves, every body segment creates a momentum vector. In many cases, the movement is rotational, in which case angular momentum is created. Most movements in life and sport are a combination of both, momentum and angular momentum. Regardless of the combination of movements throughout the body, running (and other functional movements) deals with horizontal forces, especially when decelerating. Since many functional activities have a horizontal component, it would be advantagous to load this component in order to enhance one’s ability to neutralize and overcome it. Let’s take a look at an example.

A third base player running down a ground ball, hit hard along the third base line, will eventually need to slow down after catching the ball, plant and turn to throw the runner out at first base. Although many vectors are at work in this sequence of movements, on the key factors involved in the success of this athlete will be his ability to quickly decelerate after catching the ball. As deceleration occurs, the center of mass is lowered and the strides begin to reach in front of the center of mass to apply deceleration forces against the ground. What you have is something that looks like Figure 1.

Figure 1

A third baseman running towards the line must eventually decelerate forces that are not vertical. These non-vertical forces are difficult to load with free weight.

The deceleration of this third base man involves overcoming two primary vectors, the horizontal momentum vector and vertical force vector provided by the body’s mass and gravitational pull (Force = body’s mass x gravitational pull). These two major vectors can be combined to provide a resultant vector of force that must be neutralized in order to bring the player to a stop (Figure 2). This resultant vector can be approximated and trained using BPT (Figure 3). By loading this resultant vector we can get stronger at overcoming it. Exactly what angle and load to use is a matter of various factors, such as: speed, stance width, location of the player’s center of mass, etc. Multiple speeds, angles and loads can be trained to simulate different sporting situations and daily activities.

Figure 3

This resisted reaching exercise can be used to train the deceleration needed by the third basemen in Figure 1.

As in the case above, many functional movements can be loaded with the use of BPT. Any movement, from pulling weeds out of the ground to throwing a ball, has a major resultant vector that can be approximated and resisted using BPT. Figuring the major vector of focus can be fun and adds to the specificity and effectiveness of the training. Don’t get caught in the heavy physics of the training. There is some room for error and a few degrees in any direction is not going to kill anyone. One key factor to keep in mind when loading any functional movement is not to use too much resistance. Too much resistance significantly changes the motor pattern of the movement and can lead to the development of inefficient movement patterns. If it smells, walks and talks like the move you are trying to enhance, then chances are you are pretty close to where you need to be. Be conservative, experiment and have some fun with your training – it’s only training, not brain surgery.

Equipment manufactures within the strength and conditioning industry have become increasingly aware of the effectiveness and diversity of vector training. Band momentum and pulley products are starting to make a comeback. Manufactures, such as Ground Zero, now make the Free-Motion line. The Free-Motion line uses pulley systems for most of its major movement pieces (Figure 4).

Figure 4

The Free Motion Line uses pulley systems on most of its major pieces. Here the shoulder press is shown in its traditional application. However, the pulley system allows unlimited exercise selection and application.

We also have a new pulley system, the Versa Pulley, on the market that is based on some really old technology. This pulley system uses rotary inertia to provide a resistance and allows one to explode into a concentric movement without fear a flying weight stack. The rotary flywheel also provides an eccentric load proportionate to the preceding concentric movement. The advantages of using pulleys over bands are a source of great debate among strength and conditioning professionals. Many coaches see the variable resistance of the band as a disadvantage. However, variable resistance provided by bands can be seen in the same positive light as other variable resistance training equipment, such as Nautilus and Universal. Variable resistance can somewhat accommodate the increasing biomechanical leverage of many movements, such as pressing. Additionally, other conditioning professionals also see the ability to perform explosive movements with bands, without flying weight stacks, as an advantage (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Band punching is one of those exercis es that require no active deceleration at the end of the concentric movement. It is great for power development.

Pulleys are seen as “non functional” by some fitness experts due to their “constant resistance” and inability to accommodate fast movements with light-weights (i.e. due to flying weight stacks). Yet, the ability to quantify the resistance is looked at as a positive characteristic of traditional pulley training by other fitness professionals. With all of this being said, one might want to consider that the concept of “constant resistance” is really a misnomer. Although the mass being lifted by a pulley system is constant, the resistance a muscle sees changes with the lever arm and the speed of the movement. Therefore, standard pulleys do not offer constant resistance. They really offer constant mass. The Versa Pulley (Figure 6) design provides an accommodating resistance and variable speeds. Its inertial cone wheel operates like a yo-yo; you unwind it by providing force (i.e. concentric) and it rewinds providing force back to you (i.e. eccentric). This has a very positive impact on power development, since there is no active deceleration at the end of a concentric movement. Various accessories, such as handles, harnesses, and attachments can inspire countless applications.

Figure 6

The MV2, rotary inertia system used by the Versa Pulley is a smooth operating system. It was initially used and described by the Russians.

Bands and pulleys, regardless of brand or characteristic, can be effectively employed to train non-vertical movement vectors. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to all resistance training equipment, bands and pulleys remain an effective tool in performance enhancement training. A wise integration of different resistance training equipment will provide the best diversity and results. Using the right tool for the right application is the final and determining factor in the success of a specific training modality.

The following article will provide the some of our favorite exercises and some programming recommendations. Subsequent articles will illustrate some of our actual workouts using bands and pulleys and hopefully convey a better understanding of this great training tool.


  1. Anderson GBJ, Bogduk N, Deluca C, et al; Muscle: Clinical perspectives on Low Back Pain. New Perspectives on Low Back Pain. Edited by JW Frymoyer, SL Gordon. Park Ridge, IL, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, pp. 293-334, 1989.
  2. Aosaki, T., et al. Responses of tonically active neurons in the primate’s striatum undergo systematic changes during behavioral sensorimotor conditioning. J Neuroscience, 14(6): 3969-3984, 1994.
  3. Blievernicht, J. Balance: Course Manual. Chicago, IL 1996.
  4. Boehme, Regi, OTR. Improving Upper Body Control. Tucson: Therapy Skill Builders, 1988.
  5. Bosco, C., Cardinale, M., Tsarpela, O., Colli, R., Tihanyi, J., Dullivard, S., Viru, A. The influence of whole body vibration on jumping performance. Biology of Sport. 15:157-164, 1998.
  6. Brody, Liz. “ The Axler: A Workout That’s Really on the Ball.” Shape. April 1993: 86-93.
  7. Carrie, Beate, P.T. “ Swiss Ball Exercises.” PT Magazine. September; 92-100. 1993.
  8. Carrie, Beate, P.T. and Linda Felix, P.T. “ In Consideration of Proportions.” PT Magazine. April 1993: 59.
  9. Carter AT: Piriformis syndrome: A hidden cause of sciatic pain. Athl Training 1988; 23(3):243-245. 1975
  10. Chek P. Scientific Back Training: Correspondence Course Manual. Paul Chek Seminars. LaJolla, CA 1994.
  11. Chek P. Swiss Ball Exercises for Athletes I-III. Paul Chek Seminars. Encenitas, CA 1997.
  12. Chek P. Scientific Abdominal Training. Correspondence Course Manual. Paul Chek Seminars. Lajolla, CA 1992.
  13. Chek P. Strong ‘N’ Stable Swiss Ball Weight Training Series, Vol. 1-3. Paul Chek Seminars. Encenitas, CA 1997.
  14. Clark, M. “Functional Leg Training”. NSCA Annual Conference, presentation. Kansa City, Missouri, 1999.
  15. Clark, M. “Foundations for Function”. Learn by Doing Seminar Series, Coral Gables, Florida, 1999.
  16. Cooper, Douglas. Dynamic Stabilization Exercises for the Lower Back. Portland: Douglas Cooper, 1992.
  17. Creager, Caroline C. Theraputic Exercises Using the Swiss Ball. Boulder: Executive Physical Therapy, 1994.
  18. Cresswell, A.G., Oddsson, L., Thorstensson, A. The influence of sudden perturbations on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure while standing. Exp Brain Res, 98:336-341. 1994.
  19. Dominguez, Richard H, MD, Gajada Robert. Total Body Training. New York: Warner Books, 1982.
  20. Farfan HF. Effects of torsion on the intervertebral joints. Can J Surg 1969;12:336-341
  21. Farfan HF. Musculature mechanism of the lumbar spine and the position of power and efficiency. Orthop Clin North Am 1975; 6:135-144
  22. Farfan, H. F., Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine in Managing Low Back Pain, Kirkaldy Willis, W.H., Ed. New York: Churchill-Livingston,1983.
  23. Foley, Erin. Personal Communication. Archivist, Robert L Parkinson and research Center. April 21, 2000.
  24. Fox, Charles P., ed. Old-Time Circus Cuts. New York: Dover Publications. 1979.
  25. Gambetta, V., "Building the Complete Athlete," (Course Manual), 1996.
  26. Gambetta, V., Clark, M., “ A formula for function”, Training and Conditioning, 8(4):24-29, 1998.
  27. Gambetta, V., Gary, G., “Following a functional path”, Training and Conditioning, 5(2):25-30, 1995.
  28. Gomez, Niska. Somarhythms: Developing Somatic Awareness with Large, Inflatable Balls.” Somatics. Spring/Summer, 1992. Pp12-18.
  29. Grabiner M. et al. Decoupling of bilateral paraspinal excitation in subjects with low back pain. Spine. 17(10):1219-1223. 1992.
  30. Granhed H, Jonson R and Hansson T. The loads on the lumbar spine during extreme weight lifting. Spine. 12(2): 146-149. 1987
  31. Gray, G.W., "Chain Reaction Festival," (Course Manual), Adrian, Michigan. Wynne Marketing.1996.
  32. Headley BJ: The “Play-Ball” Exercise Program. St. Paul. Minnesota, Pain Resources, Ltd., 1990.
  33. Hodges, P.W. , Richardson, C.A. Inefficient Muscular Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine Associated with Low Back Pain. Spine, 21(22):2640-2650, 1996.
  34. Hodges, P.W., Richardson, C.A., Jull, G. Contraction of the Abdominal Muscles Associated with Movement of the Lower Limb. Phys Ther, 77:132-14, 1997.
  35. Hypes, Barbara. Facilitating Development and Sensorimotor Function: Treatment with the Ball. Minnesota: P Press, 1991.
  36. Klien-Vogelbach, Suzanne. Theraputic Exercises in Functional Kinetics. Germany: Springer-Velag, 1991.
  37. Koes BW, Bouter LM, Beckerman H, et al. Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review. BMJ. 1991; 302;1572-1576.
  38. Kucera, Maria. Gymnastik mit dem Hupfball (Exercise with the GymBall). 5Th Edition. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1993.
  39. Maurer, H. (no date) Gymnastik Ball. A Handout. 7112 Waldenburg zur Ausbildung von; Gymnastiklehrerinnen F.M.B.H.
  40. Miller DJ: Comparison of electromyographic activity in the lumbar paraspinal muscles of subjects with and without chronic low back pain. Phys Ther 65:1347-1354, 1985.
  41. Multiple Muscle Systems; Biomechanics and Movement Organization. Edited by Jack M. Winters and Savio L-Y Woo. pg 252-253
  42. Nachemson A, Morris JM. In vivo measurements of intradiscal pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Am.;46:1077-1080. 1964
  43. Nachemson AL: Disc Pressure measurements. Spine. 6;93-97, 1981.
  44. Nachemson, A. The load on the lumbar disks in different positions of the body. Clin Orthop.;45:107-112. 1966
  45. Nachemson, A.L., The Lumbar Spine, An Orthopedic Challenge. Spine 1:59, 1976.
  46. Necking, L., Dahlin, L., Friden, J., Lundborg, G., Thronell, L. Vibration-induced muscle injury: An experimental model and preliminary findings. J. Hand Surg. 17:270-274. 1992.
  47. Necking, L., Lundstrom, R., Lundborg, G., Thronell, L., Friden, J. Skeletal muscle changes of short term vibration. Scan. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 30:99-103. 1996.
  48. Pace JB: Commonly overlooked pain syndromes responsive to simple therapy. Postgrad Med; 58(4):107-113.
  49. Paruidge MJ, Walters CE. Participation of the abdominal muscles in various movements of the trunk in man, an EMG study. Physical Therapy Review;39;791-800. 1959
  50. Porterfield J.A. and DeRosa C. Mechanical Low Back Pain. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Co. 1991
  51. Posner-Mayer, J. Swiss Ball Applications for Orthopedic and Sports Medicine. Denver: Ball Dynamics International, Inc. 1995.
  52. Rathke, F., Knupfer, H. (no date) Exercise Ball: Exercising tool for child development. A handout. Stutttgart. Municipal Center.
  53. Robinson, R. The New Back School Prescription: Stabilization Training Part I. Occupt Med. 7(1):17-31. 1992.
  54. Saal J. Dynamic Muscular stabilization in the Nonoperative treatment of lumbar pain syndromes, in Orthopedic Review Vol. XlX No. 8 Aug 1990.
  55. Saal J. et al. Non operative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine,. 21(16). 1996
  56. Santana, JC. The Essence of Stability Ball Training, Vol I-II. Optimum Performance Systems, Boca Raton, Florida, 1999.
  57. Seroussi RE, Pope MH: The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes. J. Biomech . 20: 135-146, 1987.
  58. Sieg, K., Adams, S. Illustrated Essentials of Musculoskeletal Anatomy. Gainsville, Fl. Megabooks, Inc. 1985.
  59. Sweet, Waldo E. Sport and Recreation in Ancient Greece: A sourcebook with Translations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
  60. Wirhed, R. Athletic ability and the anatomy of motion. Wolf Medical Publications. 1990.
  61. Wolpaw, J.R., Braitmman, D. J., Seegal. Adaptive plasticity in the primate spinal reflex: initital development. J Neurophysiology. 50:1296-1311, 1983.
  62. Wolpaw, J.R. Acquisition and maintenance of the simplest motor skill: investigation of CNS. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 26(12):1475-1479, 1994
  63. Zetterberg C, Andersson GBJ, Schultz AB: The activity of individual trunk muscles during heavy physical loading. Spine 12:1035-1040, 1987
  64. Ziethen, Karl-Heniz, Allen, Andrew. Juggling: The Art and Its Artists. Berliniwerner Rausch & Werner Luft. 1985.