Nutrition The “High” Cholesterol Myth by Justin Smith | Date Released : 22 Aug 2009 9 comments Print Close As health and fitness professionals, we are on the front line in the battle against the misinformation that is propagated by those with financial interests. It is our duty to purvey the scientific facts about the prevention of disease. Pharmaceutical companies have altered the definition of high cholesterol in order to increase the number of people who are eligible for cholesterol medications. As a result, increasing numbers of our clients are being told that they have high cholesterol when in fact their cholesterol is normal. What is Normal Cholesterol? The first thing to note about cholesterol levels is that they vary tremendously between different people. Supporters of cholesterol-lowering medications would have us believe that the ideal cholesterol level is below 200 mg/dl, but we have known for decades that cholesterol can vary from 105 mg/dl to 343 mg/dl in people who are perfectly healthy6. Figure 1 below shows the range of cholesterol levels found in healthy people. Figure 1 This same range of cholesterol levels has been seen in people who do have heart disease and people who do not have heart disease, as documented by Professor Brisson using data from the Framingham Study, which is one of the largest studies ever done on cholesterol. If people with heart disease have the same cholesterol levels as people who do not have heart disease, then it is impossible for cholesterol to be a risk factor. A person may have a cholesterol level that is above the average, or above the arbitrary level set by drug companies, but is this actually high for them as an individual? The only way we can find out the answer to this question is if cholesterol has been measured more than once over a reasonable period of time. Even then, the cholesterol measurement itself is often unreliable since the obtained value can be influenced by the following: Body position Smoking or other nicotine use Stress Pain Fear Pregnancy Lack of exercise The use of various drugs and medicines Alcohol consumption How blood is drawn for the test The presence of hepatitis, gall bladder obstructions, low-thyroid function, etc The season of the year7 There are instances where a person has experienced a significant increase in cholesterol over time, but these cases are related to a problem with the metabolism of cholesterol: not cholesterol per se. In these cases, it is advisable to work with a holistic health practitioner such as a Certified Metabolic Typing Advisor, CHEK Practitioner or Naturopath, in order to systematically address this issue. Blindly attempting to lower cholesterol without addressing any underlining imbalances will result in more problems in the long term. Cholesterol Levels Have Actually Declined Despite all the hype about cholesterol, many industrialized countries around the world have seen a significant reduction in the average cholesterol level and even greater reductions in the number of people with so called “high” cholesterol. For example, in the USA, the number of people with a cholesterol level above 240 mg/dl in 2002 was around half the number in 1962. Figure 2 below shows cholesterol levels for all USA adults aged 20 to 74 years. A similar trend can be seen in England, where cholesterol levels have reduced over a shorter period of time2. More importantly, this reduction in cholesterol is much more apparent in older age groups, the very people who are at greater risk for developing heart disease. But unfortunately, these reductions in cholesterol have not resulted in reductions in the rate of heart disease1. The Role of Cholesterol within the Body Far from being a deadly substance, cholesterol is a life creating and life supporting molecule. Cholesterol is needed by every single one of the body’s 70 to 100 trillion cells. Cholesterol, along with saturated fats, is vitally important for the structural integrity of all the cells that make up the body. Physicists have investigated what happens when cells do not contain enough cholesterol. The result is cells die quickly or do not function! This means that every system within the body can be affected by a lack of cholesterol, since all of these systems are dependent upon healthy, living, properly functioning cells. Blood cells and nervous system cells are particularly vulnerable to damage caused by a lack of cholesterol. A lack of cholesterol can cause white blood cells, needed for the immune system, to break down or stop functioning. This may explain why people with low cholesterol are more vulnerable to infection. Cholesterol is also responsible for a number of other specific functions within the body. It provides the starting point for all of the steroidal hormones. These hormones are involved in virtually every body function. All steroidal hormones are created from cholesterol (see Figure 3). Figure 3 Cholesterol also forms the starting point for the synthesis of vitamin D and for the production of bile acids. The bile acids are needed for the digestion and absorption of fats and fat-soluble vitamins. In a nutshell, without enough cholesterol in the body, basic cell structure could not be formed, there would be a deficiency in some vital nutrients, the hormonal system would not function correctly, bodily systems would break down, the brain and nervous system would malfunction and digestion would be compromised. Unfortunately, those who are obsessed with lowering cholesterol conveniently ignore these facts of physiology. Why So Much Interest in Cholesterol? A huge amount of money is being made from the misconceptions about cholesterol. In fact, a cholesterol-lowering industry is now in place that generates around US$29 billion each year. We are constantly told that cholesterol clogs up the arteries and causes a heart attack. This idea stems from an out dated and inaccurate view of heart disease that the food industry and pharmaceutical companies would like us all to believe. It has been known for some time that heart disease is mostly an inflammatory condition. The process starts with initial tissue damage. This tissue damage actually occurs underneath the inside wall of the artery or blood vessel, and once it is present, the body reacts by sending various substances to the affected area. A wide range of different molecules are found in the wall of an artery that has been damaged in this way. Yes, fat and cholesterol are present, along with a number of other substances such as monocytes and macrophages (white blood cells that are associated with inflammation). Cytokines are also found that have specific effects on cell-to-cell interaction. So too are T lymphocytes, which are white blood cells that increase in the presence of an infection5. Heart disease has been compared with rheumatoid arthritis, a condition that also has key inflammatory and immune system components. The inflammation that occurs in heart disease is very similar to the type of inflammation we experience. For example, in the case of a sprained ankle joint, pulled muscle or other structural injury. In the case of a muscular skeletal injury, we are fully aware of it and we know that if we rest the affected area or undertake appropriate treatment, it will normally repair itself. However, in the case of tissue damage and inflammation in the arteries, we usually have no idea that it is taking place. Therefore, we may continue doing whatever is causing or aggravating the inflammation, until one day we start to experience symptoms or in the worse case, a heart attack. There are a wide range of things that can cause or contribute to this type of arterial damage including: High levels of stress/poor stress response Wrong balance or “mix” of foods Eating too many grain-based foods High blood glucose levels Eating too many refined foods and sugars High blood pressure Low thyroid function/adrenal gland exhaustion Hormonal imbalances Exercise: wrong type or amount for the individual person Processed and de-natured foods Psychology: depression, negative attitude Lack of protective nutrients Excessive toxins Infection Lack of sleep One of the main causes of heart disease is eating too much carbohydrate for our own individual metabolism. This results in high blood glucose, which damages our arteries in several ways. This is the subject of my next article. Note: Cholesterol can be measured in both mg/dl and mmol/l. A conversion table is below (LDL, HDL and Total Cholesterol). mmol/l mg/dl 20 0.5 40 1.0 60 1.5 80 2.1 100 2.6 120 3.1 140 3.6 160 4.1 180 4.6 200 5.1 220 5.6 240 6.2 260 6.7 280 7.2 300 7.7 320 8.2 340 8.7 360 9.2 380 9.7 References: Allender, S. Peto, V. Scarborough, P. Kaur, A and Rayner, M. 2008. “Coronary Heart Disease Statistics: Chapter 2 Morbidity” British Heart Foundation: London. Available at http://www.heartstats.org Allender, S. Peto, V. Scarborough, P. Kaur, A and Rayner, M. 2008. “Coronary Heart Disease Statistics: Chapter 10 Blood Cholesterol” British Heart Foundation: London. Available at http://www.heartstats.org Brisson, G.J., 1981. “Lipids in Human Nutrition: An Appraisal of Some Dietary Concepts” Jack Burgess, New Jersey CDC. Faststats: cholesterol (based on 2004 National ambulatory medical care survey). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats also at http://www.cdc.gov/cholesterol/facts.htm Crossman, D. “Science, Medicine, and the Future: The Future of the Management of Ischaemic Heart Disease” British Medical Journal 1997; 314:356 Smith, J., 2009. “$29 Billion Reasons to Lie about Cholesterol: Making Profit by Turning Healthy people into Patients” Troubador, Leicester Smith, R.L., 1993. “The Cholesterol Conspiracy” Warren Green, Missouri Back to top About the author: Justin Smith Justin Smith is the author of the book $29 Billion Reasons to Lie about Cholesterol: Making Profit by Turning Healthy People into Patients. As an experienced nutrition and exercise coach, Justin has helped a large number of people within the corporate sector. For four years, he was based at the BBC in West London as a personal trainer. He has also worked with professional and Olympic level athletes. His specialties include: Integrated Exercise Prescription, Metabolic Typing, Hair Mineral Analysis, Neurotransmitter Balancing and Detoxification Protocols. Before his career in the health and fitness industry, Justin obtained a degree in Engineering. This rigorous academic background has provided him with the ability to scientifically evaluate published research and the conclusions drawn from it. In addition to his academic accomplishments, Justin was also a competitive cyclist for nine years. Full Author Details Related content Content from Justin Smith Low-Fat Diets and Heart Disease Justin Smith | Articles The Dangers of High Blood Glucose Justin Smith | Articles Interval Training and Cholesterol Matthew Kadey | Articles Exercise and "Bad" Cholesterol Lisa Hardy | Articles High Cholesterol Noah Hittner | Articles Walking and LDL Cholesterol John Mamana | Articles High Cholesterol Lenny Parracino | Articles Low-Fat Diets and Heart Disease Justin Smith | Articles The Scientific Basis for Metabolic Typing, Part 2 (of a 2 part series) Justin Smith | Articles The Scientific Basis for Metabolic Typing, Part 1 (of a 2 part series) Justin Smith | Articles The Dangers of High Blood Glucose Justin Smith | Articles The “High” Cholesterol Myth Justin Smith | Articles Please login to leave a comment Comments (9) Smith, Justin | 28 Oct 2009, 11:13 AM I am delighted to find so many comments about my article. This provides me with the opportunity to give more information in specific areas. A comment is made below regarding the relationship between genetics and inflammation. Yes, I agree that genetics has a part to play, but this, in my opinion, is merely stating the obvious – since genetics has a role to play in everything. The important and most significant point is the heart disease is mostly an inflammatory condition. We are now beginning to understand just how important this inflammatory process is, but unfortunately, the general public and indeed many health professionals are still unaware of this because of the commercial interests in cholesterol-lowering medications and the false idea that cholesterol simply blocks up the arteries. On another point, yes, statins can have an effect on the stabilisation of plaque within arteries. This is an important point and I am glad it has been mentioned. In clinical trials involving secondary prevention (people who have already had at least one heart attack) there is some evidence that statins might be beneficial in the short-term – this is because of the “other effects” of statins (including plaque stabilisation) – effects that have nothing to do with cholesterol at all. These benefits have to be compared against the adverse effects of the drugs - a debate way beyond the scope of this particular article but one that I have included in my book. This particular article is specifically about the myth of 'high' cholesterol. Unfortunately, I must directly address the comments made by David Driscoll below. Although I fully welcome your opinion, I respectfully ask that you do not make comments about my book before you have actually seen a copy of it. My book contains hundreds of references to studies published in the most respected medical journals in the world. There is no conspiracy, just a coherent scientific argument. It took me many years of hard work to research and write the book. I fully welcome and actively encourage your critical review – all I ask is that you read at least part of it first. Reply Smith, Justin | 28 Oct 2009, 10:14 AM From some of the comments below, it appears that more information is required regarding the normal distribution of cholesterol levels. It is understandable that many people get confused over this issue considering the amount of propaganda associated with cholesterol. The cholesterol hypothesis is (of course) that an increased cholesterol level results in an increased risk for heart disease. However, when we look at cholesterol levels for those who do have heart disease and those who do not have heart disease, we find that cholesterol levels are the same for both groups. Therefore, the hypothesis that cholesterol causes heart disease is false. A comment has been made below that other factors will have an effect – yes, this is absolutely correct and precisely the point that I have made in this article. That is: other factors are most certainly having an effect and cholesterol has got nothing to do with a person's risk for heart disease. If cholesterol was a risk factor, then the normal distribution graphs would be different for those who do have heart disease and those who do not. This is the most basic concept of statistics and epidemiology. The strength of the argument that I have presented in this aspect is reinforced by the fact that both the groups used for comparison are from the same study. For anyone who would like to understand medical statics, I would recommend the book titled Handbook of Essential Concepts in Clinical Research, published by The Lancet. I should also mention that I am not the first person to present this particular point. This fact about the normal distribution of cholesterol levels has been highlighted by Professor Brisson, Dr Uffe Ravnskov, and it is also discussed by Erik Rifkin and Professor Bouwer in the book The Illusion of Certainty. I would also add that a number of medical doctors and scientists have read what I have written and none have questioned the validity of the statement. Reply Leyva, John | 20 Oct 2009, 08:21 AM If you're looking for a definitive source on the whole process of how high cholesterol became associated with heart disease and the science behind it, I would highly recomment Gary Taubes' "Good Calories, Bad Calories". It's one of the most highly researched books and just reading the first section of the book should give you a much clearer picture on what cholesterol and the diets recommeneded to lower it actually have done to people. Reply CHAMBERLAIN, GAIL | 16 Oct 2009, 05:55 AM Also, do not forget that statins cause damage to muscle tissue. This is unequivocal whether the damage is small or large. Muscle damage is not a "rare but serious side effect" as touted on warning statements by the drug manufacturers. Do we forget that the heart is also a muscle. Reply Reynolds, John | 29 Sep 2009, 23:09 PM It is a completely viable idea that 'we' have been mislead about the effects of either high or low cholesterol. However, we need to weigh up each argument on its merits. You do not need a drug to 'battle' cholesterol levels if they are stable to begin with. Eating simply (no processed food, not too many carbs) would benefit us greatly and would solve this issue. That is our struggle as PTs, to convince our clients that the 1980s vision for convenience needs to be a part of history not our future. It is the responsibility of all of us (medical profession included) to keep investigating the truth and ignore the influence of large pharmaceutical companies. Reply Rohner, Douglas | 25 Sep 2009, 04:42 AM I agree that all the information has to be refined. I would like to hear peoples opinions on Ancel Key's as well considering he basically launched the whole cholesterol idea in america from his 7 nations study, while expelling alot of pertinent information. Reply Driscoll, David | 25 Sep 2009, 03:41 AM Yet another example where PTs should pull their heads in and either go and get a medical degree or stick to the area they are trained in. Going and reading a couple of books on conspiracy theories (and publishing your own) and then cherry picking a study or two that supports yours views isn't science - I'm sure they even teach that in engineering!It's funny that you quote the Crossman paper for a reference on inflammation and fail to mention his statement "The inflammatory response in any individual is programmed by their genetic composition". Why do you ignore this bit when recommending CHEK practitioners for treatment?Crossman also admits that "The beneficial effects of aspirin and statins has convinced us that plaque pacification therapy is possible". Is this not worthy of a mention?And when stating "but we have known for decades that cholesterol can vary from 105 mg/dl to 343 mg/dl in people who are perfectly healthy" can you really do no better than to quote your own book?I also find you arguement that cholesterol is vital and too little can result in serious conditions not evidence that too much can't be harmful. Surely the same arguement can be made for any nutrient, without it we would die, therefore it can't be toxic?? Reply Magill, Andrew | 16 Sep 2009, 06:26 AM While it is always important to challenge widely held perceptions about helath or exercise which may not be based in fact and I would agree that it benefits drug companies to attemtp to increase the demand for cholesterol lowering drugs, I think we should be careful as trainers not to give advice about doctor described medications and to understand how to correctly evaluate research findings. Specifically, although I think many of the conclusions from the Framinham study are quite good, a large study (such as the Framingham study) does not automatically mean that all conclusions drawn from the data are accurate or valid. In addtion, stating that "beacuase a group of people withouth heart disease had similar ranges in cholesterol levels to people who did have heart disease proves that cholesterol is not a risk factor for heart disease" is not a valid conclusion. There may be other reasons that the group of people withouth heart disease did not develop it. Please better understand how to evaluate scientific research and/or more clearly explain the research you cite before using it to attempt to prove a point of view. Reply Beer, Thomas | 29 Aug 2009, 03:27 AM I would like to read a response from a cardiologist /neurologist on the effects of high cholesterol on heart disease Reply Back to top