Research Corner - Q&A How Fast Can the Heart Beat? by Dr. Rob Orr | Date Released : 26 Sep 2005 0 comments Print Close Question: I have a client who's heart rate shot up while undertaking the three minus point aerobic test on the treadmill. She runs regularly on the treadmill, but during the test, at the third workload minus, she was running at a speed of 10.9 km/h minus her heart rate shot up to 225 bpm. I slowed her down to walking immediately as it was obviously too intense for her, and her heart rate recovered and stabilized very quickly. Because of the basic formula to calculate max HR as 220 minus age, I have it in my mind that 220 is the maximum beats per min that a heart can beat. I know that this can't be true, so could you please advise me on how fast the heart can beat and any other information that you feel would be useful with regards to the above? Answer: Based on gender averages, women have a lower blood volume and smaller hearts (therefore, smaller left ventricles) than men. Cardiac Output for the same absolute output is however generally the same in both sexes. With heart rate and stroke volume being the predominant determinants of Cardiac Output, the virtual equality would mean that an increased heart rate in females is needed to compensate their smaller stroke volumes. Considering this, Shield and Young recommended the use of the following formula modifications: PMHR = 220 minus Age (Males) and 225 minus Age (Females) However, with this in mind, current research has maximal heart rate being genetically determined, and although influenced by age, it is not determined by gender or fitness. Back to maximal heart rates. The formula 220 minus age is actually used to determine the Predicted Maximal Heart Rate (predicted being the key word). In fact, several other formulas for predicting maximal heart rate have alternate "maximal" start points including: PMHR = 206.3 minus (0.711 x Age) from Londeree and Moeschberger (1982) PMHR = 210 minus (0.65xAge) by Jones and Baker (1996) PMHR = 217 - (0.85 x Age) Miller et al (1993) PMHR = 208 minus 0.7 (Age) Tanaka and Sales et al (2001) Dr. Haskell, one of the proposers of the 220 minus age formula in the 1970s, stated that the formula was never meant to be used as an absolute guide to govern training. With this in mind, the formula is a rough guide providing some standardization and a basic start point for developing training intensities, but it is not the absolute formula. Highlighting this fact, Dr Lauer. found that, during studies looking at heart rate recovery times as a predictor of heart disease, more than 40 percent of patients would break the age predicted maximum based on the 220 minus age formula. Furthermore, studies by Tanaka & Seals et al in 2001 found that the formula underestimates maximal heart rates in older adults, leading to the recommended formula change to 208 minus 0.7 (age). Having looked at gender and the formula itself, one other often neglected area must be addressed, that being how the heart rate was measured. While monitors using heart straps are considered more accurate, accuracy can be affected if not positioned correctly or the strap is not sufficiently lubricated. Likewise, grip monitors (e.g., on handlebars) are influenced by skin conditions (temperature, vasodilation, etc) as well as the conduction between hand and monitor. Personally, the methods I use for monitoring a change in my client’s fitness are: The Karvoenen formula ({[PMHR – Resting Heart Rate] X Intensity} + Resting Heart rate) to determine training intensities at 60, 70 and 80 percent measuring actual heart rates, their own rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (this lets me know if I can or cannot increase the workload) distance covered and speed. I then repeat the test in several weeks and plot the differences (Microsoft Excel does this well) by either getting them to repeat the same speeds and use their HR and RPE as outcome objectives or use the same PHMR (not readjusting their Heart Rate Reserve for their Karvoenen formula) and using their Speeds, Distance and RPE as outcome objectives. The benefit of this method is that it provides both objective and subjective outcomes. If a patient does desire to compare herself to the "normative" population, I prefer to use a VO2 test, either in a lab or using the 20 m Progressive Shuttle Run ("Beep") test and comparing her results to obtained data. I hope this helps. References: Fox SM, Haskell WL: The exercise stress test: needs for standardization, in Eliakim M, Neufeld HN (eds): Cardiology: Current Topics and Progress. New York, Academic Press, 1970, pp 149-154 Jones,K., & Baker,K.,(1996). Human Movement Explained. Jordin Hill,Oxford : Butterworth & Heinemann. Kolata, G (2001) 'Maximum' Heart Rate Theory Is Challenged, The New York Times’ Published: April 24, 2001 Londeree and Moeschberger (1982) 'Effect of age and other factors on HR max' - Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 53(4), 297-304 Miller et al (1993) - 'Predicting max HR' - Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 25(9), 1077-1081 Shield,T., & Young, L.(1995). Fitness a Systematic Approach. Coorparoo, Bne: Fitlink. Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR: Age minus predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(1)153 -156 Back to top About the author: Dr. Rob Orr Dr. Rob Orr joined the Australian Army in 1989 as an infantry soldier before transferring to the Defence Force Physical Training Instructor (PTI) stream. Serving for 10 years in this stream, Rob designed, developed, instructed and audited physical training programs and physical education courses for military personnel and fellow PTIs from both Australian and foreign defence forces. Rob subsequently transferred to the physiotherapy stream where his role included the clinical rehabilitation of defense members and project management of physical conditioning optimisation reviews. Serving as the Human Performance Officer for Special Operations before joining the team at Bond University in 2012, Rob continues to serve in the Army Reserve as a Human Performance Officer and as a sessional lecturer and consultant. Rob is also the co-chair of Tactical Strength and Conditioning (TSAC) – Australia. Rob’s fields of research include physical conditioning and injury prevention for military and protective services from the initial trainee to the elite warrior. Generally focussing on the tactical population, Rob is actively involved in research with the Australian and foreign defense forces, several police departments (both national and international), and firefighters. The results of Rob’s work and academic research have been published in newspapers, magazines and peer-reviewed journals and led to several health and safety awards. In addition, Dr. Orr serves as the section editor for the Australian Strength and Conditioning Journal – TSAC Section and the shadow editor for the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) TSAC Technical Report. Rob is regularly invited to deliver training workshops and present at conferences both nationally and internationally. Full Author Details Related content Content from Dr. Rob Orr Karvonen vs. 220–Age Heart Rate Training Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Max Heart Rate Testing Dr. Rob Orr | Articles High Heart Rate with Exercise Mike Demora | Articles Heart Rate Targeting Stephen Holt | Articles Line drills part 2 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Line drills part 1 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Injuries Typical of Tactical Populations and Their Recovery Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Optimizing the Conditioning of New Tactical Trainees Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Muscle Contractions, Part 3: How to Use Them - Practical Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Muscle Contractions, Part 2: How to Use Them - Theory Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Muscle Contractions, Part 1: Different Types Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Treadmill Running - A Review Dr. Rob Orr | Articles The Functional Continuum Dr. Rob Orr | Articles The Art of Spotting - Part 1 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Surfer with Scoliosis Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Weighted Vests Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Group Power Classes Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Resistance Training Programs – Part 2 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Resistance Training Programs – Part 1 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Healthy Weight Gain Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Calorie Burn Before or After Eating Dr. Rob Orr | Articles BMR and Obesity Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Line Drills - Part 2 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Best Time of Day to Exercise Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Line Drills - Part 1 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Paddle Board Racing Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Optimizing Workout Routines Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Hypoxic Work in the Pool Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Run and Bike Cross Training Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Programming for Partner Training Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Periodized Programs - Part 3 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Blurred Vision with Cardio Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Periodized Programs - Part 2 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles How Fast Can the Heart Beat? Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Floaters and Sinkers in Water Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Periodized Programs - Part 1 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Karvonen vs. 220–Age Heart Rate Training Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Fartlek Training for Group Exercise Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Walk Test on Treadmill Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Weights vs. Cardio for Weight Loss Dr. Rob Orr | Articles What is the Fat Burning Zone? Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Treadmill vs. Land Walking/Running Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Max Heart Rate Testing Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Running/Walking vs. Cycling, Swimming Comparison Dr. Rob Orr | Articles High Altitude Hiking Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Metabolic Conditioning Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Fartlek Training for Group Exercise Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Circuit Training Variations - Part 2 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Circuit Training Variations - Part 1 Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Lactic Acid and Fat Burning Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Energy Expenditure for Running Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Designing Effective Circuits Dr. Rob Orr | Articles The Functional Continuum Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Heat Balance Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Anaerobic and Aerobic Conditioning Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Swimming Dr. Rob Orr | Articles Please login to leave a comment Comments (0) Back to top